PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds) |
Memory | 20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160408 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Aug 24 '21 at 22:15 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
77.2%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
111%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 408 373 345 399 383 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 131 132 136 125 128 MB/s
|
73.6%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 10 | 7 | 165 | 27" | 1280 720 | AUS2720 VG278 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 228x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 103x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 52x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples | 40x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 39x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 37x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 42% - Average | Total price: $1,193 |