Positivo POS-PIH55BO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Positivo POS-PIH55BO (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo POS-PIH55BO
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100615
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '21 at 02:57
Run Duration	262 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 550-$110 19,058 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Memory 59.5 1-Core 52.4 2-Core 49.8 37% 53.9 Pts	4-Core 72.7 8-Core 97.3 11% 85 Pts	64-Core 104 6% 104 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200 6,989 User benchmarks, average bench 2% PowerColor(148C 5230) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.63% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 2 2% 2.1 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 2 Splatting 2 2% 2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.63% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK1255GSX H 120GB 1,072 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: FG001Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 45.2 Write 48.4 Mixed 37.9 33% 43.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 41%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 29GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 3.2 3.8 5.8 4.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	7.38% Terrible	Read 22.4 Write 15.9 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 5.2 19% 14.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2.1 109% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.38% Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 2GB 402 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 9.2 9.2 8.8 9.2 9.2 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 20.6 Write 8.2 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 9 13% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 75% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	18.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 5.8 17% 5.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.2 16% 5.5 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 4: 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
4%	8%	24	16	12	60	24"	1920 1080	GSM5850 M2450D

History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 4: 0R 1G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical POS-PIH55BO Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-PIH55BO

CPU
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	22x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	7x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	12x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	10x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x
S101/120GB 120GBFanxiangBench 60%, 27 samples	2x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	20x
10GBUnknownBench 31%, 21,027 samples	5x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16