PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H110M-HDV (all builds) |
Memory | 4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180226 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Aug 21 '21 at 20:22 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 49% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
60.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 90 98 104 87 79 MB/s
|
53.2%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
255GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 160 161 162 159 158 MB/s
|
87.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
58.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 131x |
Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 118x |
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 89x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 92x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 73x |
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 69x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $314 |