Asus P7P55D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55D  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '21 at 16:44
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 163
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 370
38% 307 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200
CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.1
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60% Above average
Lighting 77
Reflection 70.1
Parallax 107
63% 84.7 fps
MRender 68.2
Gravity 83.6
Splatting 53.2
54% 68.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 0 0 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 200GB
140GB free
Firmware: 3.ADD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 57.6
Write 58.7
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 56.7
39% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 34%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$35
59GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 64 61 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 61.9
Write 63.2
Mixed 39.1
SusWrite 63.1
42% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 42%
General UDisk 16GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.6 4.7 3.8 4.2 4.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5.2
Write 0.2
SusWrite 4.1
3% 3.17 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.5% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 20% 5 110 6 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0D3B SAMSUNG
Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $159
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback