PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
Memory | 5.1 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111102 |
Uptime | 4.7 Days |
Run Date | Aug 12 '21 at 23:30 |
Run Duration | 240 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3565
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
56.5%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10365
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 88 87 86 78 MB/s
|
32%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
409GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 69 80 82 86 84 MB/s
|
41.9%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$50
589GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 101 101 108 94 MB/s
|
63.5%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
295GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 93 110 110 113 97 MB/s
|
63.6%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
991GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 68 82 80 82 72 MB/s
|
50.8%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 91 104 99 112 95 MB/s
|
78.2%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10% | 7% | 54 | 166 | 29 | 60 | 31.5" | 1920 1080 | PHLC180 PHL 328E9Q |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 568x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 533x |
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 487x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 270x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 154x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 137x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 135x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 72x |
A400 480GBKingston $37Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 65x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $258 |