Asus PRIME X299-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-A  (all builds)
Memory56.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '21 at 15:58
Run Duration350 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$420
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 76.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 255
81% 150 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 902
83% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,715
106% 1,715 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 1B82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 131
Parallax 120
100% 124 fps
MRender 93.9
Gravity 125
Splatting 111
90% 110 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,512
Write 1,227
Mixed 466
235% 1,068 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 56
201% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,154
DQ Write 830
DQ Mixed 905
700% 963 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Kingston SKC2000M82000G 2TB
163GB free
Firmware: S2681102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1331 1304 1202 1195 1182 1184 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,910
Write 1,413
Mixed 181
SusWrite 1,233
263% 1,184 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 58.6
226% 89.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,188
DQ Write 902
DQ Mixed 538
540% 876 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 267%
Great: 368%
Samsung 860 Pro 4TB-$846
4TB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 443 450 447 443 444 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 450
Mixed 426
SusWrite 447
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 46.2
161% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 352
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 112%
Great: 131%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
213GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 447 447 445 447 446 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 448
Mixed 334
SusWrite 446
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 35.5
127% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 168
178% 295 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 116%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 111 105 107 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 118
Write 99.5
Mixed 61
SusWrite 108
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
8GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 62 57 57 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 35.3
Write 61
Mixed 45
SusWrite 55.8
37% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.4
122% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 87%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178
58GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 101 99 99 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 89.2
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 98.9
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 106 111 108 107 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 108
Write 87.2
Mixed 96.5
SusWrite 107
74% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 101%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 130 135 135 128 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 115
Write 134
Mixed 95
SusWrite 127
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
387% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 93%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 185 190 190 190 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 150
Mixed 107
SusWrite 187
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.9
457% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 100%
Great: 93%
WD My Passport 2TB
1TB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 92 93 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 87.8
Write 83
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 91.8
105% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 44%
WD My Passport 2TB
479GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 96 97 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
40% Average
Read 92.5
Write 93.3
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 94.8
108% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 62.4
MC Mixed 35.8
128% 44.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 10.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 32" 1280 720 BNQ8025 BenQ PD3200U
Typical PRIME X299-A Builds (Compare 1,269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $744
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback