Positivo POS-MA760GCP

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Positivo POS-MA760GCP (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo POS-MA760GCP
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121024
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '21 at 13:30
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Memory 71.6 1-Core 56.5 2-Core 107 49% 78.5 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 205 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6850 31,600 User benchmarks, average bench 12% MSI(1462 2441) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1002 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Lighting 18 Reflection 20.3 Parallax 15.7 15% 18 fps	MRender 13.7 Gravity 12.8 Splatting 11.2 10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 137 130 134 137 118 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.5% Poor	Read 151 Write 144 Mixed 62.8 SusWrite 137 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 13.2 4K Mixed 14.3 42% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 17.3 DQ Write 19.1 DQ Mixed 10.1 10% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 55%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 8.7 7.3 8.5 7.9 6.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	2.6% Terrible	Read 4.2 Write 3.5 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 7.4 6% 4.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.6% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP698651-154-KEB 1x8GB 275 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	27.9% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 9 26% 9.17 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 8.5 25% 8.77 GB/s	Latency 97.7 41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 61: 9R 5G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
61%	28%	53	69	56	60	18.5"	1366 768	SAM08A6 S19B300

History: Score 8: 1R 0G 3B | Score 18: 0R 4G 6B | Score 43: 6R 4G 1B | Score 61: 9R 5G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical POS-MA760GCP Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-MA760GCP

CPU
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	2x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples	1x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
SH564128FH8N0QHSCR Kingston 9965525-139.A00LF 12GBUnknownBench 40%, 3 samples	1x
KHX1600C10D3/8G SH564128FH8N0QHSCR 12GBKingstonBench 28%, 3 samples	1x
99U5471-054.A00LF SH564128FH8N0QHSCR 12GBKingstonBench 33%, 2 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $96

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16