Asus MAXIMUS VIII GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII GENE  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateAug 07 '21 at 10:53
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 45%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 205
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 324
42% 320 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.2% Average
Lighting 51.7
Reflection 58.4
Parallax 80.2
42% 63.4 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 61.4
Splatting 44.9
45% 56.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 225 216 219 217 215 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 245
Mixed 372
SusWrite 224
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 43.5
177% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 324
239% 315 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 131%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
45GB free
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 100 102 105 106 111 MB/s
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.6% Good
Read 255
Write 149
Mixed 182
SusWrite 105
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 36.9
148% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 110
88% 122 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 75%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
140GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 79 77 76 72 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 97.5
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 75.5
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
180% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 71%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
867GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 129 130 126 130 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 82.6
Write 125
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 128
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1
142% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
67.6% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 22.9
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 65: 6R 9G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
65% 30% 77 322 261 144 27" 2560 1440 ACR0489 XB270HU D
History: Score 31: 4R 1G 8B | Score 65: 6R 9G 8B
Typical MAXIMUS VIII GENE Builds (Compare 993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII GENE - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $939
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback