Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190717
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 06 '21 at 11:58
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	56%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600-$165 18,241 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 81.9 1-Core 126 2-Core 265 86% 158 Pts	4-Core 463 8-Core 530 65% 496 Pts	64-Core 677 42% 677 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.9% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 126 Parallax 112 91% 116 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 98.2 Splatting 96.8 88% 110 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 97%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 470 Write 465 Mixed 285 90% 407 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 86.2 4K Mixed 48.4 152% 54.7 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 306 241% 335 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 110%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 10GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 248 Write 244 Mixed 207 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 68.3 4K Mixed 43 137% 47.2 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 192 144% 193 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB 77,202 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 23 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 24.5 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 77.1 52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 51: 5R 6G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
51%	23%	84	340	278	165	27"	2560 1440	ACR0408 XB270HU

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	191x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	180x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	127x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	78x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	61x

SSD
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	35x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	32x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	30x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	32x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	25x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 119% - Outstanding

Total price: $260

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16