Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	11.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC 7R32 76 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Memory 54.7 1-Core 110 2-Core 192 65% 119 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 222 35% 252 Pts	64-Core 261 16% 261 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 76%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 107GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 37 37 32 92 113 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11.9% Very poor	Read 112 Write 133 Mixed 112 SusWrite 56.1 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 3.3 13% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x16GB 15,722 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	83.5% Excellent	MC Read 35.9 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 42.6 96% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 15.2 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	6	4	0	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16