Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 04 '21 at 21:25
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 87.1
1-Core 160
2-Core 313
101% 187 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 889
94% 750 Pts
64-Core 1136
70% 1136 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
MSI(1462 3369) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2527 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 133
Reflection 143
Parallax 133
108% 136 fps
Gravity 144
Splatting 121
116% 133 fps
Poor: 93% Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2306RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 348 417 431 441 452 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 451
Mixed 264
SusWrite 413
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 36.1
146% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 128
132% 218 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 101%
Great: 99%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
76GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,557
Write 2383
Mixed 1,700
492% 2,214 MB/s
4K Read 69.8
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 96.8
322% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,419
DQ Write 1,277
DQ Mixed 1320
998% 1,339 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 95 81 96 91 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 134
Write 109
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 91.7
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.3
102% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 83%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 152 150 152 153 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 138
Write 130
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 152
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
21GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 82 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 75.4
Write 79.4
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 80.6
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
33GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 55 55 56 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 56.4
Write 7.7
Mixed 15.1
SusWrite 54.7
24% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 36.3
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 38.6
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 144 27" 1280 720 MSI1462 Optix MAG27CQ
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $857
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback