Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	7.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210426
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '21 at 14:34
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400-$137 24,459 User benchmarks, average bench 94% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 95.1 1-Core 163 2-Core 329 106% 196 Pts	4-Core 631 8-Core 990 100% 811 Pts	64-Core 1,208 75% 1,208 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730 14,644 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9127 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	7.24% Terrible	Lighting 7.9 Reflection 15.6 Parallax 9.3 6% 10.9 fps	MRender 12.8 Gravity 8.2 Splatting 11.2 9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.24% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$88 58,572 User benchmarks, average bench 341% 375GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3144 3144 1888 734 742 745 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	315% Outstanding	Read 806 Write 3,199 Mixed 2,876 SusWrite 1,733 495% 2,154 MB/s	4K Read 82.5 4K Write 210 4K Mixed 114 383% 136 MB/s	DQ Read 1,418 DQ Write 1,189 DQ Mixed 1,246 949% 1,284 MB/s
Poor: 206% ↑ This bench: 315% Great: 442%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB 2,997 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 10GB free, PID 558a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 11 9.2 8.9 8.8 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 35.6 Write 18.7 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 12.6 27% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 2.9 197% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB 87,891 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 42.6 MC Write 38.6 MC Mixed 35.5 111% 38.9 GB/s	SC Read 25.5 SC Write 40.1 SC Mixed 33.1 94% 32.9 GB/s	Latency 56.7 70% 56.7 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	75	21.7"	1280 720	GSM5B55 LG FULL HD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,981 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS

CPU
Core i5-11400FIntel $116Bench 94%, 46,609 samples	553x
Core i5-11400Intel $137Bench 94%, 24,459 samples	325x
Core i7-11700KIntel $249Bench 101%, 65,651 samples	298x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $275Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	452x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	288x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	169x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	84x
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples	83x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	82x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	194x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	107x
KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GBKingstonBench 91%, 43,162 samples	93x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $459

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16