Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics64.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '21 at 04:15
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 84%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 126
2-Core 252
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 577
64% 495 Pts
64-Core 629
42% 629 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.8% Good
Lighting 78
Reflection 97.5
Parallax 64.1
63% 79.9 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 78
Splatting 67.4
67% 85.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 75%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
789GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3402101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 267 251 282 271 270 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40% Average
Read 247
Write 319
Mixed 203
SusWrite 262
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 5.3
22% 8.4 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 81.1
86% 138 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 40%
Great: 103%
Team T2535T120G 120GB
35GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 63 40 52 44 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 313
Write 283
Mixed 269
SusWrite 56.2
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 19.9
93% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 47.6
89% 172 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$42
817GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 186 172 194 195 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 186
Mixed 39
SusWrite 188
108% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
52GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 21 20 19 21 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 22.1
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 19.2
31% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.4
163% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 16GB
1700, 1700 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.6
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF B360M-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $484
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback