Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH560
Memory	23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210305
Uptime	11 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '21 at 11:05
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 60.8 1-Core 120 2-Core 190 69% 124 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 541 53% 434 Pts	64-Core 695 43% 695 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2016) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	4.22% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 88.9 Parallax 4.4 3% 32.5 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 6.7 6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.22% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D1024 1TB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 181% 718GB free (System drive) Firmware: CQA0904 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1346 1348 765 518 476 428 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	166% Outstanding	Read 1,158 Write 1,583 Mixed 1,074 SusWrite 813 261% 1,157 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 59.1 4K Mixed 45.8 137% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 647 DQ Write 570 DQ Mixed 592 449% 603 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 166% Great: 249%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GB 253 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	72% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 21.7 73% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 33.4 SC Mixed 24.8 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	SHP1529 LQ156T1JW03

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036 Builds (Compare 736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	736x

GPU
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	337x
RTX 3080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 125%, 16,265 samples	210x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	180x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	320x
CA5-8D1024 1TBNvmeBench 181%, 641 samples	185x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples	45x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	221x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	173x
NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GBUnknownBench 75%, 253 samples	101x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16