Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190823
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '21 at 19:16
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 Quad-Core 7,120 User benchmarks, average bench 67% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 74.6 1-Core 105 2-Core 212 73% 131 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 408 53% 400 Pts	64-Core 410 25% 410 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Sapphire(174B E324) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.3 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	15.5% Very poor	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 74.6 Parallax 85.9 0% 53.6 fps	MRender 64.7 Gravity 60.3 Splatting 45 45% 56.7 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000L2 128GB 6,569 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4L1QCXB7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 110 157 158 156 155 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 604 Write 744 Mixed 555 SusWrite 149 115% 513 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 10.3 92% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 549 DQ Write 576 DQ Mixed 424 357% 516 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 320%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$37 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 144GB free Firmware: UF360000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 145 149 147 147 149 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 442 Write 358 Mixed 201 SusWrite 149 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 18.1 75% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 79.1 DQ Mixed 41.1 46% 78.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB 14,156 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	47.1% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 15 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 15.3 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 91.3 44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	7	60	23.5"	1280 720	ACI249A ASUS VS247

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,635 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	816x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	783x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	743x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	772x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	447x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	413x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	346x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $37Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	183x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	258x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	194x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	144x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $428

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16