Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506LI
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '21 at 17:37
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 82,821 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 210 82% 141 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 437 48% 382 Pts	64-Core 439 27% 439 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1E91) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.57% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 53.8 Parallax 4.3 3% 20.5 fps	MRender 6.4 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 7.6 5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.57% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB 33,645 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 411GB free (System drive) Firmware: P6MA001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 864 990 1094 1096 1091 1078 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	218% Outstanding	Read 1,329 Write 833 Mixed 936 SusWrite 1,036 232% 1,034 MB/s	4K Read 56.9 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 69.3 240% 83.2 MB/s	DQ Read 613 DQ Write 624 DQ Mixed 264 296% 500 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 218% Great: 247%
SanDisk Cruzer Spark 16GB 1,145 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 11GB free, PID 55a1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.7 4.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	6.08% Terrible	Read 23.9 Write 3.5 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 4.5 9% 9.27 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 36% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.08% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB 28,935 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 12.4 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 14.5 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	6	120	15.5"	1280 720	AUOD0ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI Builds (Compare 2,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	2,409x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples	322x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	27x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	1,527x
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples	1,230x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,203 samples	1x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	1,044x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	394x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	353x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples	529x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	488x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	366x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16