PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME B360M-A (all builds) |
Memory | 8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210416 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Jul 25 '21 at 07:42 |
Run Duration | 244 Seconds |
Run User | UKR-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 164 63 49 7.1 51 MB/s
|
46.2%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
210GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 135 134 135 129 134 MB/s
|
82.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
27GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 5.7 4.9 5.9 6.3 5.7 MB/s
|
8.23%
Terrible
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler C10 4GB
4GB free, PID 1641
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 9.2 10 10 10 9.8 MB/s
|
6.17%
Terrible
|
|||
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB
7GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.4 3.7 4.5 3.4 3.4 MB/s
|
3.39%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
61.8%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 28.8" | 2560 1080 | GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,540x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 1,320x |
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 1,279x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 487x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 447x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 426x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $1,024 |