Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 165%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime10.2 Days
Run DateJul 25 '21 at 06:30
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$385
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 84
1-Core 136
2-Core 269
92% 163 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 862
84% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,412
95% 1,412 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Asus(1043 87B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 250
Reflection 224
Parallax 249
202% 241 fps
MRender 285
Gravity 206
Splatting 152
176% 214 fps
Poor: 133%
This bench: 190%
Great: 226%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$56
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 853 852 153 28 54 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,300
Write 874
Mixed 827
SusWrite 332
185% 833 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 44.6
148% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 671
DQ Mixed 220
249% 412 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 141%
Great: 252%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
115GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 414 408 405 403 395 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 406
Write 410
Mixed 298
SusWrite 407
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 29.9
103% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 159
122% 164 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79
197GB free
Firmware: 3.CHN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 58 58 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 61.7
Write 58.9
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 58
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 44%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
170GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 76 63 47 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 50.7
Write 108
Mixed 41
SusWrite 58.2
47% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
69% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
97% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 37.7
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 28.2
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 35.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 45: 5R 4G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 42% 40 104 5 165 27" 1920 1080 AUS2720 VG278
History: Score 46: 8R 1G 3B | Score 45: 5R 4G 8B
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 73,190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,206
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback