Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200813
Uptime7 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 19:06
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 75.7
1-Core 147
2-Core 293
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 902
88% 721 Pts
64-Core 1325
82% 1325 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 96%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 60 28 32 32 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 292
Write 64.8
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 50.3
25% 117 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 0.1
40% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 34.9
80% 160 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 70%
Sabrent Rocket Q4 1TB
307GB free
Firmware: RKT40Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1675 1660 1653 955 128 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,698
Write 1,745
Mixed 1,484
SusWrite 1,036
335% 1,491 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 84.7
291% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 770
DQ Write 1,210
DQ Mixed 971
741% 984 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 266%
Great: 331%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
397GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 114 113 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 147
Write 151
Mixed 102
SusWrite 113
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 109%
SABRENT 1TB
178GB free
Firmware: RKT303.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1662 885 900 913 883 858 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 142 141 141 141 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 147
Write 122
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 141
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84% Excellent
MC Read 34
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 33.9
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 33
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 60 0" 1280 720
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $645
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback