Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210623
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 12:55
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 239
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 913
82% 690 Pts
64-Core 1,265
78% 1,265 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 169
Parallax 169
141% 170 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 157
Splatting 129
127% 159 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 129%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 146 167 159 125 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 489
Write 448
Mixed 404
SusWrite 172
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 37.2
120% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 138
110% 154 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 124%
JD 480GB 480GB
31GB free
Firmware: JD20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 147 7.1 8.9 9.3 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 498
Write 398
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 63.2
53% 242 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 8.93 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 111%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
29GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 11 11 11 10 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 18.8
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 11.4
25% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 2.6
213% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 34.4
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 31.1
92% 32 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 61: 8R 4G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
61% 36% 59 307 240 144 24.1" 1920 1080 SAM0F90 LC24RG50
Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $602
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback