Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 months ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210623
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 12:55
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$280
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 119
2-Core 230
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 887
83% 670 Pts
64-Core 1,260
85% 1,260 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$770
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
136% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 169
Parallax 169
140% 170 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 157
Splatting 129
131% 159 fps
Poor: 117%
This bench: 136%
Great: 149%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 146 167 159 125 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 489
Write 448
Mixed 404
SusWrite 172
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 37.2
120% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 138
110% 154 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 124%
JD 480GB 480GB
31GB free
Firmware: JD20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 147 7.1 8.9 9.3 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 498
Write 398
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 63.2
53% 242 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 8.93 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 111%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
29GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 11 11 11 10 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 18.8
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 11.4
25% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 2.6
213% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 34.4
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 31.1
92% 32 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 61: 8R 4G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
61% 36% 59 307 240 144 24.1" 1920 1080 SAM0F90 LC24RG50
Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 9,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $823
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback