PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Default string (all builds) |
Motherboard | INTEL X99 |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210115 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 21 '21 at 23:24 |
Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
Run User | COL-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
64.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia(10DE 145C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 63 75 19 36 38 MB/s
|
34.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
32GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 160 158 161 160 159 MB/s
|
92.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
Mass Storage Device 500GB
462GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
|
20.1%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
56.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 12 | 10 | 60 | 72.3" | 1280 720 | GSM0001 LG TV |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 1,015x |
Xeon E5-2640 v3IntelBench 71%, 3,267 samples | 948x |
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples | 898x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 482x |
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples | 473x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 454x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |