PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VS3 (all builds) |
Memory | 0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130711 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 21 '21 at 12:53 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | THA-User |
Background CPU | 82% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3340-$278
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
55.6%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1138) 2GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 67 55 50 56 MB/s
|
49.3%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 106 | 2 | 60 | 20" | 1600 900 | SAM06A1 SME2020 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 38x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 31x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 23x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 64x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 18x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $97 |