Acer Swift SF314-59

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-59  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Kona_TL
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 21 '21 at 11:31
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 166
76% 125 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 484
51% 399 Pts
64-Core 478
32% 478 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 148C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 30.1
20% 27 fps
MRender 0
Gravity 0
Splatting 0
0% 0 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 25%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 926
Write 876
Mixed 831
196% 878 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 59.3
220% 87.3 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 758
DQ Mixed 402
343% 486 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 211%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung U6E3S4AA-MGCR 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 57.5
MC Mixed 37.7
126% 44.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 17.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 60 13.9" 1280 701 CMN14D4
Typical Swift SF314-59 Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 24%
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 22%

System: Acer Swift SF314-59

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback