Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive299% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '21 at 12:14
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$310
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 68.3
1-Core 134
2-Core 271
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 917
90% 717 Pts
64-Core 1,354
91% 1,354 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$150
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 39% Great: 51%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
868GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1945 2040 1999 1799 1938 1930 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 1,434
Write 1,933
Mixed 1,635
SusWrite 1,942
394% 1,736 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 72.7
230% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,220
DQ Write 1,079
DQ Mixed 1,137
856% 1,145 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 299%
Great: 357%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$70
59GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 39 33 36 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 21.2
Write 45.1
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 35.7
21% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 76%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 64GB
28GB free, PID 009f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 7.8 7.8 7.8 6.5 7.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
6.42% Terrible
Read 22.2
Write 1.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 7.3
10% 9.68 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.42%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
64.9% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 25.9
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 23.6
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 57: 7R 6G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
57% 13% 128 108 5 60 27" 2048 1152 SAM0E15 C27HG7x
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $845
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback