Biostar Hi-Fi A85W

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Biostar Hi-Fi A85W (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 16 '21 at 03:07
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	52% Above average	Memory 67.4 1-Core 74.7 2-Core 126 54% 89.4 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 205 28% 210 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Gigabyte(1458 351C) 1GB CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Lighting 18.8 Reflection 26.3 Parallax 17.8 15% 21 fps	MRender 27.3 Gravity 20.7 Splatting 18.2 18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 64GB 4,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 132 127 121 138 135 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 406 Write 164 Mixed 195 SusWrite 133 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 18.6 86% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 56.9 DQ Mixed 96.3 83% 127 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 63%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 466GB free Firmware: 1AJ1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 139 138 138 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	77% Very good	Read 130 Write 35.9 Mixed 74 SusWrite 138 70% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.2 220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 77%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 16GB 531 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 139 Write 43.3 Mixed 38.3 74% 73.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.8 146% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 EKM324L28BP8-13 M378B5673GB0-CH9 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.4% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 11.7 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 11 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	7.2"	1280 720	SAM05D5 SyncMaster

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Hi-Fi A85W Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar Hi-Fi A85W

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	18x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	7x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	2x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	2x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	2x

SSD
MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GBCrucialBench 77%, 2,468 samples	9x
830 128GBSamsung $109Bench 63%, 37,250 samples	1x
Premier Pro SP900 128GBAdata $40Bench 69%, 2,820 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 7,217 samples	6x
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GBElpidaBench 40%, 1,380 samples	2x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 5,657 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16