HP OMEN by HP Laptop PC 17-an108nc

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	72.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop PC 17-an108nc (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 846A
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201102
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 13 '21 at 09:39
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Memory 93 1-Core 114 2-Core 228 83% 145 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 702 73% 587 Pts	64-Core 882 55% 882 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% HP(103C 846A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (41^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.4% Very good	Lighting 85.5 Reflection 117 Parallax 99.2 70% 101 fps	MRender 90.6 Gravity 91.2 Splatting 99.9 78% 93.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB 20,750 User benchmarks, average bench 209% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA73H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1743 925 607 607 579 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	210% Outstanding	Read 998 Write 1,778 Mixed 728 SusWrite 844 246% 1,087 MB/s	4K Read 57 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 72.3 238% 80.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,100 DQ Write 882 DQ Mixed 986 740% 990 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 210% Great: 295%
Asmt 2115 128GB 351 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 117GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 187 178 191 199 199 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 328 Write 188 Mixed 203 SusWrite 189 51% 227 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 13.3 63% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 79.8 DQ Mixed 29.9 39% 70.1 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 63%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 930GB free Firmware: RPM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 168 179 179 177 171 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 155 Write 138 Mixed 75.1 SusWrite 173 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 95%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 4GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID c08a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 11 11 11 12 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	7.22% Terrible	Read 21.9 Write 8.5 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 11.1 14% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.22% Great: 7%
USB Flash Disk 0GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4.2 Write 3.8 Mixed 4 5% 4 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 26% 1 MB/s
Poor: 0% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB 20,226 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	MC Read 32.9 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 23.1 85% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 35.8 SC Mixed 25.2 76% 26.6 GB/s	Latency 62 64% 62 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	120	17.2"	1280 720	CMN1749

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16