PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA (all builds) |
Memory | 48.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191206 |
Uptime | 3.3 Days |
Run Date | Jul 13 '21 at 01:14 |
Run Duration | 326 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
26.4%
Poor
|
||||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
123%
Outstanding
|
|||
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.2%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$76
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 976 643 692 664 630 578 MB/s
|
135%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
32GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 277 292 298 297 278 MB/s
|
66.2%
Good
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
53GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 54 54 54 54 MB/s
|
29.9%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
123GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 85 73 76 81 91 MB/s
|
53.4%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CMW64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
57.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
58% | 61% | 36 | 128 | 32 | 144 | 27" | 2560 1440 | ACI27A7 ASUS MG279 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $270Bench 99%, 60,132 samples | 564x |
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $415Bench 88%, 197,342 samples | 523x |
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $199Bench 98%, 128,080 samples | 453x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3080Nvidia $670Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 324x |
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $585Bench 204%, 155,335 samples | 267x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 193x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $1,039 |