Packard ixtreme M5801

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard ixtreme M5801 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard ixtreme M5801
Memory	2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100517
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '21 at 14:23
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 550-$110 19,058 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Memory 51.3 1-Core 73.3 2-Core 125 48% 83.1 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 162 22% 164 Pts	64-Core 167 10% 167 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420 9,903 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B 1162) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.68% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 1.7 2% 2.2 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2 Splatting 1.9 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.68% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$94 19,345 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 343GB free Firmware: X41110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 191 199 187 191 197 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.8% Above average	Read 202 Write 198 Mixed 178 SusWrite 192 44% 193 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 24.4 80% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 190 145% 197 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 107%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 719GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 57 51 45 43 47 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 107 Write 89.4 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 50.4 57% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HD155UI 1.5TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 709GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 39 38 38 39 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 32.8 Mixed 30.7 SusWrite 38.1 46% 33 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 22%
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 222GB free, PID 110c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 19.9 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 24.7 31% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M378B5773CH0-CH9 3x2GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 9.2 23% 8.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.3 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	22"	1280 720	HWP2811 HP w2228h

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ixtreme M5801 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Packard ixtreme M5801

CPU
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	8x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	2x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	3x
GeForce GT 420NvidiaBench 2%, 9,903 samples	3x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x
HFS250G32TND-N1A0A 250GBBench 94%, 1,620 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5773CH0-CH9 3x2GBUnknownBench 26%, 71 samples	2x
M378B5773CH0-CH9 80CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 80AD HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 80CE M378B5273CH0-CK0 12GBUnknownBench 27%, 2 samples	2x
CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GBUnknownBench 55%, 150 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $399

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16