Asus H110-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170705
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '21 at 03:38
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 86.9 1-Core 110 2-Core 197 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 585 58% 474 Pts	64-Core 647 40% 647 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.5% Average	Lighting 56.1 Reflection 61.5 Parallax 56.3 46% 58 fps	MRender 62.4 Gravity 59.8 Splatting 55 48% 59.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 56%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 470GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 96 96 125 125 129 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	74% Very good	Read 148 Write 108 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 110 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB 7,973 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.7% Good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 21.9 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 20.2 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 63: 8R 5G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
63%	57%	37	248	189	120	24.5"	1680 1050	ACR0603 XF250Q

History: Score 33: 3R 4G 6B | Score 63: 8R 5G 8B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,735 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H110-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	1,186x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	84x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	71x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	572x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	77x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	73x

SSD
Green 120GB (2016)WD $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples	380x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	49x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	39x

RAM
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 26,065 samples	728x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	96x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16