Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B360M AORUS Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJul 10 '21 at 02:47
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 205
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 434
53% 407 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 875B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.7% Excellent
Lighting 121
Reflection 111
Parallax 135
99% 122 fps
MRender 170
Gravity 122
Splatting 0.2
69% 97.4 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 38 58 59 41 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
56% Above average
Read 378
Write 183
Mixed 278
SusWrite 60.4
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 24.6
94% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 19.1
60% 134 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
40GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 122 122 118 116 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 59
SusWrite 118
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
14GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 94 98 97 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 48.7
Write 70.6
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 92.6
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
50% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
618GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 113 112 112 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 87.2
Write 93.2
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 112
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 75%
Kindle Internal Storage 7GB
6GB free, PID 0324
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 9.7 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 17.7
Write 13.2
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 10.4
20% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 4.5
384% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 19.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 12
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 6 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0C2F S24E310
Typical GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,887 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $529
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback