Asus MAXIMUS IX EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory44.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 08 '21 at 23:06
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 100
2-Core 183
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 454
47% 378 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23% Poor
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 35.4
Parallax 33.6
25% 33.1 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 19.4
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 23%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB-$105
726GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 235 248 241 250 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 317
Write 286
Mixed 216
SusWrite 244
60% 266 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 21.4
81% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 176
140% 197 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 108%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
6TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 76 94 96 101 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 149
Write 109
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 93.1
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 100%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 105 104 105 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 117
Write 104
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 104
129% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 59%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 245 230 245 241 263 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 210
Write 195
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 245
246% 184 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 86%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
61.4% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 22
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 17.6
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 2R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 16% 62 102 54 120 27" 1920 1080 SAM0DC9 C27FG70
History: Score 7: 1R 0G 2B | Score 24: 2R 3G 5B
Typical MAXIMUS IX EXTREME Builds (Compare 374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $908
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback