Asrock 760GM-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 760GM-HDV (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180511
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '21 at 14:36
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	42.9% Average	Memory 59.5 1-Core 50.8 2-Core 82.5 41% 64.3 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 196 22% 170 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.8% Poor	Lighting 29.2 Reflection 31 Parallax 30.1 24% 30.1 fps	MRender 34.5 Gravity 33.1 Splatting 22.8 24% 30.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 263GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 160 156 174 147 146 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.3% Average	Read 213 Write 188 Mixed 196 SusWrite 155 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 31.9 4K Mixed 23.3 74% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 130 100% 136 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 125%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB 16,094 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2TB free Firmware: SC11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 150 143 158 143 151 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Read 162 Write 146 Mixed 54.9 SusWrite 146 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM 333 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 6 18% 6.17 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	34.1"	1280 720	GSM7714 LG HDR WFHD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 760GM-HDV Builds (Compare 306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-HDV

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	120x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	63x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	46x

GPU
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	37x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,092 samples	8x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	48x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	15x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16