Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	9.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DV
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '21 at 12:54
Run Duration	254 Seconds
Run User	TUN-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Memory 44.5 1-Core 38.7 2-Core 73 32% 52.1 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 243 28% 218 Pts	64-Core 256 16% 256 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile) 119,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 140F) ≥ 4GB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	9.45% Terrible	Lighting 9.8 Reflection 21.7 Parallax 4.9 8% 12.1 fps	MRender 11.3 Gravity 19.5 Splatting 14.2 12% 15 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 9.45% Great: 83%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB 29,713 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1MA0V4 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 726 Write 808 Mixed 715 168% 750 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 27.4 86% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 426 DQ Write 455 DQ Mixed 439 331% 440 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 181%
Wilk USB DISK 2.0 16GB 302 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 8GB free, PID 4300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 1.3 0.1 3.7 4.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 23.7 Write 1.8 SusWrite 2.1 7% 9.2 MB/s	4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB 20,226 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56.7% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 22.5 64% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 11.9 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 182 22% 182 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
1%	25%	4	172	64	60	15.5"	1280 720	NCP002D

History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 1: 0R 0G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV Builds (Compare 696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	623x
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	73x

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	377x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	278x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	41x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	375x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	124x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	63x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 76%, 20,226 samples	206x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	129x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	79x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16