Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111012
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJul 05 '21 at 06:34
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Memory 60.6
1-Core 8.6
2-Core 36.9
26% 35.4 Pts
4-Core 46.2
8-Core 78.2
8% 62.2 Pts
64-Core 17.6
1% 17.6 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B6) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Luminoutek 120GB 120GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0929A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 121 59 64 39 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 327
Write 299
Mixed 15
SusWrite 88.4
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 16.9
60% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 87.3
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 0.6
52% 119 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170ME68F9F1600 Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.8
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 3% 62 19 13 60 14" 1366 768 SEC3649
History: Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 6: 0R 2G 0B
Typical 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $228
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback