Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium P6100 6,283 User benchmarks, average bench 35% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Memory 36.8 1-Core 27.5 2-Core 71.7 27% 45.3 Pts	4-Core 87.1 8-Core 89 12% 88.1 Pts	64-Core 98.6 6% 98.6 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C06A) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.34% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.1 0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.34% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 292GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1C2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 71 0 39 97 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.8% Very poor	Read 105 Write 66.1 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 58.9 18% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 11.2 4K Mixed 5.1 20% 7 MB/s	DQ Read 17 DQ Write 27 DQ Mixed 14 13% 19.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DCST4GN568S 802C 16JTF51264HZ-1G6M1 8GB 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.1% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 9.4 23% 7.97 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.3 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 218 18% 218 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples	25x
Pentium P6100IntelBench 35%, 6,283 samples	14x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	8x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	56x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 26%, 995 samples	8x
AD73I1B1674EU 2x2GBAdataBench 25%, 429 samples	4x
M471B2873FHS-CF8 80CE M471B5673FH0-CF8 3GBUnknownBench 22%, 115 samples	4x

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $130

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16