PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 91.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140605 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Jul 03 '21 at 14:29 |
Run Duration | 242 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.3%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$55
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 386 409 409 372 362 MB/s
|
91.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
48GB free
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 179 172 177 132 88 MB/s
|
67.9%
Good
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
60GB free
Firmware: CR100-13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 37 39 38 38 MB/s
|
25.3%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
171GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 57 56 58 57 MB/s
|
37.4%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 16GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
55% | 25% | 53 | 282 | 209 | 100 | 23.5" | 1920 1080 | MSI1462 Optix MAG24C |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 37x |
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 5x |
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 3x |
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 3x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $814 |