Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190708
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 01 '21 at 10:53
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$154
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 74.1
1-Core 149
2-Core 290
91% 171 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 995
93% 775 Pts
64-Core 1428
88% 1428 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 190
Reflection 170
Parallax 162
155% 174 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 138
Splatting 115
115% 144 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 133%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
83GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 150 149 150 151 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 434
Mixed 388
SusWrite 184
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 54.4
182% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 199
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 115%
SABRENT 1TB
540GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1434 872 875 538 534 418 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 DDR4 3000 2OZ DDR4 3000 DDR4 3000 2OZ 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.3% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 27.9
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 29.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 3R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 15% 66 275 221 60 27" 1920 1080 SAM0F9D C27R50x
Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $792
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback