Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime22 Days
Run DateJun 29 '21 at 17:46
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$270
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 84.8
1-Core 135
2-Core 269
92% 163 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 823
84% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,095
74% 1,095 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 5.1
4% 5.33 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 263 255 269 238 264 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,292
Write 1,085
Mixed 890
SusWrite 259
196% 882 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 45.6
206% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 503
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 295
243% 354 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 146%
Great: 222%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$100
765GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 116 118 118 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 61.7
Write 65.8
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 117
59% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$79
731GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 98 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 101
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 99.5
67% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 84%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
995GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 106 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 139
Write 124
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 107
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 84%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$45
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 140 144 144 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 160
Write 146
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 142
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$79
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 34.9
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 33.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 10: 2R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 3% 60 39 22 60 23.5" 1920 1080 ACR042E Acer K242HQL
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 73,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,198
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback