Casper EXCALIBUR G770

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Casper EXCALIBUR G770 (all builds)
Motherboard	CASPER G770 001
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191025
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '21 at 14:50
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	51%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	56.1% Above average	Memory 63.8 1-Core 95.6 2-Core 153 60% 104 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 317 38% 295 Pts	64-Core 335 21% 335 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Quanta(152D 1199) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.56% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 61.9 Parallax 6.9 5% 25 fps	MRender 6.5 Gravity 6.2 Splatting 9.8 6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.56% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB 27,523 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 125 130 53 77 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 366 Write 165 Mixed 279 SusWrite 93.2 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 21 4K Mixed 1 46% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 24.9 DQ Mixed 23.4 39% 79.8 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 91%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB 7,333 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 764GB free Firmware: JU000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 105 108 107 107 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 128 Write 147 Mixed 54.8 SusWrite 107 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.5 219% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905744-006.A00G 1x16GB 297 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 10.6 34% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 11 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EXCALIBUR G770 Builds (Compare 3,265 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G770

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	713x
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples	631x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	536x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	737x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	454x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	351x

SSD
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $45Bench 166%, 55,360 samples	646x
SA400M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 70%, 27,523 samples	376x
SSD 500GBKioxia-exceriaBench 175%, 10,941 samples	323x

RAM
CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 1x16GBCrucialBench 44%, 1,443 samples	469x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	255x
CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE 1x16GBCrucialBench 45%, 941 samples	196x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $45

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16