Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141009
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 11:48
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 186
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 507
51% 416 Pts
64-Core 577
36% 577 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Zotac(19DA 2346) 1GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 15.8
14% 14.4 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 16.1
15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 429
Write 362
Mixed 326
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 43.4
142% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 351
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
34GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,086
Write 875
Mixed 483
180% 815 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 38.1
137% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 787
DQ Write 637
DQ Mixed 628
493% 684 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
23GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 116
Write 18.7
Mixed 63.1
50% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
Generic USB Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 19.1
Write 6
11% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.4% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.2
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 9% 23 49 5 60 27" 1920 1080 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $390
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback