Intel X79M-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardIntel X79M-S  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 23:08
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2643 0-$1,040
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 142
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 452
44% 362 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
PNY(196E 100A) 3GB
CLim: 1321 MHz, MLim: 1833 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.5% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 74.4
Parallax 88.9
52% 75.9 fps
MRender 83.8
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 62.6
56% 68.9 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0318A0G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 173 238 137 176 54 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 901
Write 366
Mixed 61
SusWrite 166
81% 374 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 22.8
102% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 392
DQ Mixed 222
190% 271 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 81%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
68GB free
Firmware: UE500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 165 83 80 83 81 MB/s
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.2% Average
Read 248
Write 206
Mixed 214
SusWrite 118
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 18.1
72% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 74.2
DQ Mixed 41.7
45% 76.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 53%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
28GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,831
Write 2,125
Mixed 1,641
418% 1,866 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 69.7
222% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 521
DQ Write 476
DQ Mixed 501
375% 499 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
218GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 74 78 76 77 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 83.5
Write 85.2
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 75.5
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.7% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 18.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 7.2" 1280 720 TCL0000 MT5531
Typical X79M-S Builds (Compare 587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X79M-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback