Medion Erazer X7843 MD99883

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion Erazer X7843 MD99883  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION P670RG1M
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151105
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 10:43
Run Duration390 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 134
55% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 349
37% 291 Pts
64-Core 355
24% 355 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M
Clevo(1558 6780) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.4% Below average
Lighting 50.2
Reflection 58
Parallax 47.9
41% 52 fps
MRender 54.5
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 46.1
27% 43.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 56%
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 6540) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
5.13% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 6.9
5% 6.57 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 9.5
5% 8.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.13%
Great: 5%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT2101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 21 23 22 23 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$42
668GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 100
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 101
60% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
2.5TB free, PID fc77
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 157 157 158 157 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 168
Write 174
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 157
171% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 7 7 5 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0C4C U28E590
History: Score 6: 0R 2G 0B | Score 11: 2R 0G 1B | Score 19: 2R 2G 3B | Score 12: 2R 0G 2B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B
Typical Erazer X7843 MD99883 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Medion Erazer X7843 MD99883

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback