PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120530 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 19 '21 at 20:03 |
Run Duration | 312 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 99% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-8120
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
48.3%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 137 149 151 155 159 MB/s
|
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
500GB free
Firmware: 2AR20003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 87 87 88 85 89 MB/s
|
45.6%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
76GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 69 70 71 67 66 MB/s
|
45.9%
Average
|
|||
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
105GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 9.8 11 10 11 12 MB/s
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 109 115 144 77 57 MB/s
|
40.7%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM
|
38.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27% | 29% | 24 | 255 | 154 | 60 | 48.5" | 1536 864 | SAM0A7D SAMSUNG |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 570x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 210x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 110x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 74x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 66x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 61x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $440 |