Gigabyte H410M H

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte H410M H (all builds)
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200527
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '21 at 18:55
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	35%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70 39,812 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 74.7 1-Core 103 2-Core 220 73% 133 Pts	4-Core 385 8-Core 504 57% 444 Pts	64-Core 479 30% 479 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 4028) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.2% Below average	Lighting 47.9 Reflection 52.1 Parallax 47.6 39% 49.2 fps	MRender 58.1 Gravity 46.5 Splatting 42.8 40% 49.1 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR041 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 98 57 64 68 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 339 Write 304 Mixed 283 SusWrite 89.1 57% 254 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 0.3 47% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 6.9 DQ Mixed 10.4 20% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 92%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB 39,407 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 364GB free Firmware: SC23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 146 146 152 150 153 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Read 136 Write 135 Mixed 65 SusWrite 148 88% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3000 1x8GB 4,421 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	24.7% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 6.8 24% 8.27 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 3.6 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 90.9 44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 33: 3R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
33%	39%	33	261	170	60	21.5"	1920 1080	SAM707B LF22T35

History:

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H410M H Builds (Compare 3,251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte H410M H - $70

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $99Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	1,065x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	733x
Core i3-10100Intel $94Bench 80%, 24,563 samples	450x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	282x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples	222x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	216x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	166x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	111x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	67x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	149x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	65x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	61x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $426

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16