Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
6 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime8.6 Days
Run DateJun 17 '21 at 20:46
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$279
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 72.5
1-Core 157
2-Core 301
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 891
92% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,129
76% 1,129 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$480
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 111
Parallax 126
101% 121 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 113
Splatting 103
100% 132 fps
Poor: 88%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR010 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1524 436 410 403 408 407 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,173
Write 1,131
Mixed 1,357
SusWrite 598
240% 1,065 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 81.3
290% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1210
DQ Write 964
DQ Mixed 1,110
825% 1,095 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 221%
Great: 230%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
440GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 153 98 22 53 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 461
Write 350
Mixed 220
SusWrite 79.7
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3.8
37% 8.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 58%
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
131GB free
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 49 51 51 49 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 430
Write 457
Mixed 401
SusWrite 94.6
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 42.8
153% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 209
184% 271 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 164 160 161 162 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 162
Mixed 106
SusWrite 161
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 104 104 106 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 118
Write 104
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 105
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.2% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.2
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 25.5
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 35: 7R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 44% 16 45 6 60 23.8" 1280 720 AUS24C1 VA249
History:
Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 21,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $768
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback