Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QM_FX506QM

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QM_FX506QM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA506QM
Memory	7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210602
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '21 at 12:19
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 19,785 User benchmarks, average bench 75% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Memory 47.6 1-Core 85.5 2-Core 151 52% 94.8 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 662 59% 501 Pts	64-Core 1,202 74% 1,202 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU) 140,621 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 16A2) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.16.07 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Lighting 9.5 Reflection 20 Parallax 34.4 8% 21.3 fps	MRender 15.4 Gravity 27.4 Splatting 22.8 18% 21.9 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB 9,047 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 399GB free (System drive) Firmware: 41000C20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2082 2207 829 837 834 823 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	265% Outstanding	Read 2,308 Write 2,321 Mixed 1,594 SusWrite 1,268 420% 1,873 MB/s	4K Read 50.5 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 66.5 217% 73.6 MB/s	DQ Read 709 DQ Write 537 DQ Mixed 652 480% 633 MB/s
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 265% Great: 313%
DISK 2GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.2 5.1 5.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	4.06% Terrible	Read 15.6 Write 5.2 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 5.2 9% 7.82 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.06% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GB 19,121 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	67.6% Good	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 25.6 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 42.4 SC Mixed 28.9 83% 29 GB/s	Latency 170 24% 170 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 11: 0R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
11%	23%	30	102	7	60	15.5"	1536 864	NCP004D

History:

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QM_FX506QM Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 69%

Battle cruiser

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QM_FX506QM

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800HAMDBench 75%, 19,785 samples	23x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	13x
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples	10x

SSD
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBBench 217%, 9,047 samples	14x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	4x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	2x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GBMicronBench 71%, 19,121 samples	11x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 3200 C22 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 80%, 2,780 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16