Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 03:00
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 68.6
1-Core 146
2-Core 288
88% 167 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 833
80% 663 Pts
64-Core 1,056
65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 219
Reflection 209
Parallax 218
178% 216 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 153
Splatting 136
130% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 150%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 1TB SSD
471GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303225
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1912 732 642 653 792 729 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1497
Write 2,254
Mixed 1,594
SusWrite 910
353% 1,564 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 59.2
193% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 949
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 209
235% 424 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 199%
Great: 286%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
281GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 406 403 421 400 376 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 502
Write 398
Mixed 353
SusWrite 401
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 32.1
104% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 168
121% 160 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 125%
PNY CS3030 2TB SSD
1.5TB free
Firmware: CS303132
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2055 1983 1500 1085 890 889 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,569
Write 2011
Mixed 1,629
SusWrite 1,400
374% 1,652 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 57.2
185% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1029
DQ Write 85
DQ Mixed 167
220% 427 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 231%
Great: 315%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
467GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 151 131 137 128 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 153
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 141
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 107%
ST2000LM 003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
368GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 74 74 74 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
34% Below average
Read 84.7
Write 63.2
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 73.6
89% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.1% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.8
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 27.4
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback