Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C875-152 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PLCSF8
Memory	0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130717
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '21 at 01:10
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	83%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 74.3 2-Core 106 60% 90.9 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 194 24% 181 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 58%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB 10,530 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 278GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN07373 SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 367 365 358 363 368 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 285 Write 309 Mixed 263 SusWrite 365 69% 306 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 38.9 4K Mixed 19.2 66% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 212 156% 208 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 313%
PNY U3 750GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 109GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Read 34 Write 34.3 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 38.9 44% 32.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 1x4GB 8,533 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	31.8% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 9.3 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 9.4 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16