Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory110.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191024
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 13 '21 at 16:00
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$329
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 77.2
1-Core 132
2-Core 254
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 946
89% 721 Pts
64-Core 1,456
98% 1,456 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$400
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 144
Parallax 200
103% 157 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 138
Splatting 97
109% 118 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 106%
Great: 115%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB
890GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1239 1170 1197 1175 1188 1185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 1979
Write 1,681
Mixed 1411
SusWrite 1,192
351% 1,566 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 71.7
239% 84 MB/s
DQ Read 1,059
DQ Write 857
DQ Mixed 968
722% 961 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 269%
Great: 390%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$179
376GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 379 379 381 381 379 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 394
Mixed 368
SusWrite 381
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 40.5
137% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 275
225% 321 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 99%
Great: 125%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$559
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 398 400 400 401 399 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 410
Mixed 390
SusWrite 400
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 49.6
162% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 340
256% 342 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 108%
Great: 135%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$179
318GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 388 383 384 383 386 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 388
Mixed 361
SusWrite 384
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 42.5
139% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 283
229% 323 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
64.9% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 20.7
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 20
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 160%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z390-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 4,046 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING - $340

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,274
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback