MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '21 at 03:27
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$613
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 164
2-Core 318
107% 192 Pts
4-Core 633
8-Core 1,213
114% 923 Pts
64-Core 2,428
163% 2,428 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$1,089
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 161
Parallax 162
126% 160 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 163
Splatting 128
128% 143 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 127%
Great: 149%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$285
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 362 365 366 363 368 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 967
Write 782
Mixed 607
SusWrite 375
152% 683 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 60.6
217% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 527
DQ Mixed 449
376% 545 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 155%
Great: 154%
Kingston A400 480GB-$55
320GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 106 9 290 15 290 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.4% Below average
Read 252
Write 13.5
Mixed 21
SusWrite 162
24% 112 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 5.7
59% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 41.9
DQ Write 8
DQ Mixed 14.5
13% 21.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 100%
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
413GB free
Firmware: 42AZS6AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1518 1006 1008 1004 1007 1011 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,520
Write 1,664
Mixed 212
SusWrite 1,092
303% 1,372 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 93.8
320% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,272
DQ Write 977
DQ Mixed 668
624% 972 MB/s
Poor: 203%
This bench: 317%
Great: 390%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$130
115GB free
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 218 209 213 215 212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,002
Write 446
Mixed 286
SusWrite 217
107% 488 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 42.9
191% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 657
DQ Write 526
DQ Mixed 389
346% 524 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 137%
Great: 142%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
2TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 156 156 150 157 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 156
Write 123
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 152
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
141% Outstanding
MC Read 77.6
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 41.9
153% 53.6 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 40.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 141%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 19,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 201%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 206%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $253

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,440
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback